When Is Digital Noise Okay in a Shot?


Digital noise is a dignified enemy for low-budget filmmakers and content creators. But when would it be okay to let a noisy shot slide?

Let me first say that this article is not about to tell you to ditch all principles and capture noisy images — far from it. After all, a clean, beautiful image is a testament to the skill set of the DP and his crew (or a testament to how much money is available). Quite like overblown highlights, I feel like noise is something we learn to avoid at all costs, and any digital noise is the calling card of an amateur failure.

Whenever a new camera is announced and the influx of digital camera influencers release their embargoed review, there is always a dedicated section for low-light performance. In it, we see ISO tests and how far you can push the newest sensor on the market before the introduction of noise. And often, if the tests aren’t great, you won’t see the camera being held by your favorite creator.

However, sometimes, you may be watching a TV show and see these issues slip into a shot — a fully financed, professional production airing visual problems that would have caused you to think twice about uploading to YouTube.


I recently watched American Gods Season 2 (it’s just not the same without Bryan Fuller steering the ship), and something instantly caught my attention in this scene from Episode 2. Hot on the trail of Laura’s abducted husband, Laura and Mad Sweeney quite literally come to the end of a road, and their pursuit is halted.

The Noise Factor: When Is it Ok to Have Digital Noise in a Shot? - American Gods
Image via Starz!.

The two characters, defeated and tired, sit in the field of flowers, pondering their next move. It looks like they were filming on an overcast day, and I have to wonder if the filmmakers captured the dialogue shots with available light. Mad Sweeney’s shot is relatively clean.

The Noise Factor: When Is it Ok to Have Digital Noise in a Shot? - Mad Sweeney
Image via Starz!.

However, when we cut to Laura, we see an apparent increase in digital noise. While the 755×400 image underneath may not highlight the extent of the noise, when you’re watching, it’s instantly noticeable.

The Noise Factor: When Is it Ok to Have Digital Noise in a Shot? - Laura Moon
Image via Starz!.

If this shot showcased a new camera, the comment section would’ve been rife with criticism at how much noise there is in low light.

The Noise Factor: When Is it Ok to Have Digital Noise in a Shot? - Laura Moon
Image via Starz!.

Yet, it’s completely fine in this circumstance. And I would wager (as I point out toward the end) the general audience wouldn’t even notice. As such, I think it’s worth taking a cue from esteemed editor Walter Murch and his Rule of Six.



Story over Continuity

Like clean visuals, with the rise of TV shows and now YouTube channels pointing out mistakes in films, you’d think that continuity is a must for an editor. However, Murch’s rules are as follows in order of importance:

  1. Cut for Emotion
  2. ​​Advancing the Story Cuts
  3. ​Cutting with Rhythm
  4. ​Lead with Eye Trace
  5. Recreate Reality on Screen
  6. ​Physical Space in a Scene

Number six represents visual continuity; as you can see, it’s at the bottom of the list. Martin Hunter, the editor for Stanley Kubrick’s Full Metal Jacket, says the following:

There’s a cut when the drill Sargent punches Mathew Motley in the stomach, and in one shot he pulls back with his left hand and in the cut, he punches with his right. Nobody ever pointed it out, as far as I know. But those kinds of things don’t really matter because, if a scene is effective, you shouldn’t be distracted by things like that. (Watch this scene in the video essay above).


Story over Visual Errors

To not sidestep the article’s point, what do Murch’s editing rules have to do with digital noise or any visual anomaly? Just as continuity is placed at the bottom of the importance list, if the take has the best emotion, you should carry that notion into your visuals, as well. There are going to be times when your footage has errors — noise, clipped highlights, or even crew members visible in the shot — but from a story and emotional perspective, it’s the strongest take, so it stays despite the faults.

I asked a friend, and my mother, to watch the scene and note any issues with the scene. My friend, knowing my technical prowess, was searching for a technical blunder but couldn’t spot any, while my mother stabbed the dark with “different shirt” and “different flower color,” even though both things remained the same. Neither of them noticed the digital noise. Quite like neither of them would have noticed clipped specular highlights or the slight shudder in a tracking shot. The general audience just doesn’t see these things. If the take strengthens the story, you shouldn’t worry either.


Cover image via American Gods (Starz!).

Looking for more on cinematography? Check these out.





Source link
Studionics The Best Media Production house in Coimbatore


Category: ,
%d bloggers like this: